Uber defiant in face of new legal challenge - stewartzies1964
Uber is pushing back against the a la mode legal gainsay to its business, locution accusations against it and its competitors are away and need correcting.
The district attorneys for San Francisco and Los Angeles sent letters this week to Uber, Lyft and Sidecar claiming they've engaged in unlawful business practices. The letters, based along a joint investigation aside the attorneys' offices, take aim at several issues, chiefly the companies' policies around driver background checks.
The checks put on't make it enough and aren't as careful as the companies claim, the district attorneys (DAs) allege. Sidecar, for instance, has misled consumers past saying IT screens out drivers who have ever wrapped up driving violations, sexual assaults and different offenses, according to its letter from the DAs, seen by IDG News Service. Similar letters were sent to Uber and Lyft, same a source with knowledge of the matter.
Uber says the claims are false. "The district attorneys have made numerous inaccurate assertions that we will correct and discuss with them," an Uber spokeswoman said. "Ridesharing is unequivocally substantiated by the California legislature, the California Public Utilities Perpetration, the governor, local jurisdictions across the state and millions of Californians," she added.
A car with Lyft's recognizable pink mustache.
Lyft and Sidecar too said they would work with the district attorneys to address the issues. "Sidecar is strongly committed to safety for both riders and drivers," the company same.
Uber's explicit policies on background checks let in county, government and multi-submit checks—but they sole go back seven years, which is the utmost allowable low California law, the strong says happening its internet site.
The checks apparently harbour't stopped bad things from happening. In Orlando, an Uber driver was recently charged with stamp battery after putting his hand inside a young-bearing passenger's blouse, accordant to a local report. And in Washington, D.C., an Uber passenger this past summer says atomic number 2 was kidnapped by his driver, as reported in The Washington Post.
The ride-sharing companies have two-faced legal challenges, caps on the number of cars they can operate and instantaneously bans in many areas they run. Uber's legality in Germany has dead stake and forth over unresolved questions of safety and insurance policy.
In California, "We value innovation and new modes of providing military service to the public; however, we involve to draw sure that the safety and well-being of consumers are adequately protected in the process," said San Francisco District Lawyer George Gascon on Friday.
The territorial dominion attorneys also say new-sprung services from all three firms that allow customers to car pool to split costs are illegal nether California law, which forbids transportation companies from charging multiple people for the same tantalize. The California National Utilities Commission has likewise challenged the services.
San Francisco's Gascon and LA DA Jackie Lacey aforementioned in the letter they'd same to meet with the firms by Oct. 8. Blackball that, their offices are prepared to take aim licit action including injunctive relief and civil penalties.
Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/435487/uber-defiant-in-face-of-new-legal-challenge.html
Posted by: stewartzies1964.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Uber defiant in face of new legal challenge - stewartzies1964"
Post a Comment